Does the Law stand in the way of a Woman's lust for $$$$$?  

 

The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1420
24/03/2019 2:56 pm  

Below is an article about a woman going to court and being awarded child support for her 52 year old daughter. Lets take a close look at this article.

"A North San Diego County woman is suing her ex-husband for child support for their now 52-year-old daughter. Toni Anderson makes no apologies for going after the man she calls her "deadbeat ex" some 50 years after he left her with their 3-year-old daughter. Anderson says her ex-husband chose to go to Canada rather than pay court ordered child support in the early 1970s. "I kind of put it on the back burner and just kind of forgot about it over the years," said Anderson. She supported her daughter while working as an interior designer in Los Angeles at a firm her daughter now runs."

So the title of the article is misleading (DUH) She has been awarded child support back in the 70s;  she is attempting to enforce and old court order. And her daughter runs the business that she began...thus I think it is fair to assume since this is in LA that she HAS $$$ and lots of it. So does she NEED child support? No her kid is grown and they have a profitable business. So this isn't about "need".

"I'm not negating the fact I was able to send my daughter to college, Paris. We traveled and had a good time. But the money runs out." Anderson admits she rents her part of the house. And now that she's retired money is tight. Then it dawned on her. "I realized in the middle of the night one night last year, 'Hey, there's no statute of limitations on child support.'"Anderson looked up old court papers and last month notified her ex-husband, who's now living in Oregon: she wanted him to pay up. But the amount she was seeking now was way beyond what he was asked to pay nearly a half-century ago. "He was only supposed to give me like a 160 dollars a month. Well, that was 50 years ago. That today is a lot more money." With accrued interest of 10 percent a year, what would have been a total payment of some $30,000 is now more than $170,000. "I don't think enough women get this. And I think they're afraid."

Well now! We find out her daughter went to college---overseas in Paris; Wonder what that cost and how she paid for it. They traveled and had a good time but NOW that she is retired, (sic) spent her money have a good time; things are tight and she needs to put the squeeze on a man for his money to clean up the mess her irresponsibility created. WOW no statute of limitations she squawks! No kidding a statue of limitations ONLY applies in criminal cases. AND now we find out she had a court judgment for child support and what is really going on here is she is seeking enforcement of an old judgement. There is no statute of limitations on a civil case BUT there IS the doctrine of Laches. "The doctrine of laches is based on the maxim that "equity aids the vigilant and not those who slumber on their rights." (Black's Law Dictionary). The outcome is that a legal right or claim will not be enforced or allowed if a long delay in asserting the right or claim has prejudiced the adverse party. Elements of laches include knowledge of a claim, unreasonable delay, neglect, which taken together hurt the opponent."

So is 50 years after the fact unreasonable delay? I think so. Interesting how the 50 year delay doesn't matter BUT she wants paid in CURRENT dollar value not the value actually assigned BY the court back in the 70s OHHHH so time DOES matter after all. The article goes on:

"along with getting what she's due, Anderson wants to the spread the word to other single parents in California: You can still collect. And to those who skipped out, her message is for them to watch out. "I think he's a little bit panicked.," said Anderson of her husband's reaction to her pursuit. "And I'm very happy because I was panicked all these years. Now, it's his turn." Toni Anderson's lawyer, Sara Yunus, Esq., an Associate Attorney for Antonyan Miranda, LLP, tells 10News a private hearing in Vista Court Wednesday resulted in a settlement of $150,000. 10News also reached out to her ex-husband's attorney. There has been no response.

SHE was panicked? When? While she was traveling around and having a good time? Now its HIS turn? WTF? His turn for what? spending money irresponsibly and then looking for some poor sap to pay the bills? HIS turn to collect all manner of state benefits? HIS turn to travel and have fun? What we have her is an example of a woman sniffing out any $$$ she can get from some guy that has nothing to do with NEED, but rather convenience. He is being called upon to support her "life style" that is now is jeopardy because she DIDN'T make plans for her retirement. She is a filthy wretched parasite...and I suspect her daughter has learned by example.  HEY DUDE run back to Canada is my advice.

https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/carlsbad-woman-wins-child-support-from-ex-husband-nearly-50-years-after-divorce


Beered by Old Buck, Uly The Cunning, #Redpillbible and 5 people
Quote
Xanthine
Founder .
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 164
25/03/2019 1:56 pm  

Everything women do is designed to extract attention and resources from men. EVERYTHING. Only problem is, they have gotten way too obvious about it.

Men are not falling for their old traps anymore. Not getting married, not having kids, not moving in together. And that's just right now. Young men today, and especially the men who will be wealthy in the future, are seeing female nature on full display and taking notes. I'm talking red pill atomic bombs of female narcissism, hypergamy, greed, promiscuity, and overall worthlessness. These whores are WORTHLESS. Their traps only worked before because they were good at hiding it and they offered a little value in return, but they don't even bother hiding it now and offer no value whatsoever.

In about twenty years time, all the young sluts you see now will be absolutely destitute. Men, especially wealthy men, will no longer support them. They are on their own. I for one am glad...I am sick and tired of seeing all these useless whores getting a free ride while good men lose everything to pay for it. That needs to stop. It's high time women stop leeching off of men and start pulling their own weight in society. 


Beered by Old Buck, Uly The Cunning, #Redpillbible and 3 people
ReplyQuote
Matcha Savage
Founder.
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1386
25/03/2019 3:11 pm  

They settled at 150.000$.

So, given the ‘right‘ judge, law is complicit to a woman’s greed - and even to her neglect and irresponsibility.

The guy is effed and a lot of women, who are neglectful and irresponsible now are contacting their lawyers.

To ask for a cash-division between the two, in case they can follow through this example to the full extent.

 

It is one annoying example of how a justice system panders to neglectful women.

50 years are a very long time.

On the other hand, the guy is an idiot to not having stayed on the course he originally had taken 50 years ago by leaving the country and NOT coming back, again.

Coming no back to the US, he ran into an open knife, because he probably could not imagine, she a) would after half a century still feel entitled to his money b) the court would feel and rule the same.

Which had to be expected in our day and age!

He underestimated his own ‘felony’ in not paying the 160$ a month in the first place, when he was ordered to pay child support in the 70’s.

Ignoring that ruling and fleeing the country made him very prone to be made an example of.

 


ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1420
25/03/2019 3:13 pm  

Good point Xanthine, and do you notice what the article DOES NOT address? Why did he leave and go to Canada? AND note the old princess never...repeat never got married again. Here is the answer--this was the early 70's in CA. She was a first wave bra-burning bitch who wanted to express-herself with her new found sexual freedom and ended up knocked up as a result and she was such a horrid entitled feminist bitch he took off for parts unknown. 

Now lets do some number crunching. The kid is 52 now thus she was born in 1967, and the Dad skipped out in 1970 when she was 3. Assuming both parents were at least 18 in 1967 that would make them 70...at least. So if this guy doesn't put up $170K they are going to through a 70+ year old man in jail? Or at a minimum wipe him out financially and leave him living in the street? 

Does this sound like equity to anyone? I suspect there is a 50/50 chance the guy offs himself. 

Well ladies chalk up another "win". No go and fuck off with your cats you dried up filthy slag.  


ReplyQuote
GregBO
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2132
25/03/2019 3:29 pm  
Posted by: The Evil Genius

Good point Xanthine, and do you notice what the article DOES NOT address? Why did he leave and go to Canada? AND note the old princess never...repeat never got married again. Here is the answer--this was the early 70's in CA. She was a first wave bra-burning bitch who wanted to express-herself with her new found sexual freedom and ended up knocked up as a result and she was such a horrid entitled feminist bitch he took off for parts unknown. 

Exactly what I was wondering T.E.G.  And did she sue for child before or after he left.  If it was afterwards, when was he notified of the outcome and what was the specified dollar amount he was ordered to pay?

A great post and as indicated, women will always look towards resources as they are always operating in the red.

​"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal." -Albert Pike

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland


Beered by Xanthine, Uly The Cunning, #Redpillbible and 1 people
ReplyQuote
Uly The Cunning
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2182
28/03/2019 3:50 am  

I would fight to every penny was gone and she had nothing to get. I would rather burn the money then give it to a selfish and wasteful female. He was more interested in peace and quiet, so he settled. She deserved nothing.

"Remember, you're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably more than she ever did."
Groucho Marx: Duck Soup (1933)


ReplyQuote
Xanthine
Founder .
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 164
28/03/2019 12:35 pm  

I just hope lots of young men are seeing this circus and taking notes. It was easy for women to find male victims to financially ass-rape in gynocentric court systems back in those days. Lets see how easy it is for them now that information about their extortion methods is spreading. I'd be willing to bet that alimony and child support payments are going to plummet to rock bottom in coming years.


ReplyQuote
GregBO
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2132
28/03/2019 12:40 pm  

Check Xanthine.  It is even so bad that a woman was awarded child support for a child conceived from a boy she raped years prior.  Are there no limits to the abuse and insanity of court verdicts?

​"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal." -Albert Pike

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland


ReplyQuote
Old Buck
Arbiter
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1790
28/03/2019 12:58 pm  

I chalk it up to another brick in the wall.  Yet another example of female absurdity.  They can convince themselves of anything, justifying ANY action they take as moral and excusable.  When you are immune to consequences, this is the type of behavior you foster.

The best advice is to stay away from females.  It is impossible, but I still try.  

Second, if you must stick your dick in one, WEAR A CONDOM!  Even if the female is on birth control, the amount of diseases out there are mind boggling.  If you don't want you dick rotting off, wear a rubber.  Can you really trust her to take her medications on a schedule?  Can you trust that those little pills were packaged properly?  

Third, once you had your fun, RUN!  Do not stick around.  And you better not have told her your real name, Chad Thundercock!

 

Do NOT chase tail. Turn yours around and live FREE!


ReplyQuote
Matcha Savage
Founder.
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1386
28/03/2019 6:37 pm  
Posted by: Xanthine

I just hope lots of young men are seeing this circus and taking notes. It was easy for women to find male victims to financially ass-rape in gynocentric court systems back in those days. Lets see how easy it is for them now that information about their extortion methods is spreading. I'd be willing to bet that alimony and child support payments are going to plummet to rock bottom in coming years.

 

Listen up, ladies! Better take your chances to use the gynocentric laws and judges, now, to legally rob someone else of his assets!

The state of affairs is changing. Your golden age of injustice, free rides and VIPussy passes is running low on days to come.

 

Check Greg and Buck.


Beered by Xanthine and Old Buck
ReplyQuote
Matcha Savage
Founder.
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 1386
28/03/2019 6:46 pm  
Posted by: Uly The Cunning

I would fight to every penny was gone and she had nothing to get. I would rather burn the money then give it to a selfish and wasteful female. He was more interested in peace and quiet, so he settled. She deserved nothing.

That puzzled me, too. Why did he lost it? Why did he settle instead of fighting? It´s a missing link and I didn´t come to an understanding of what has really happened, there. In the foreground of the article is the promotion aspect: the woman is openly adressing other women to consider starting a wave of cases by following her example and demand money from men they fucked 50 years, ago.

She could even be a shill used by the people who profit big time from the family court man-grinder to exploit the last drops out of a d(r)ying market.


Beered by Uly The Cunning
ReplyQuote
Uly The Cunning
Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2182
28/03/2019 10:49 pm  

Many men get tired of fighting as they get older. He sounds like a guy who put up with a lot in his life, and maybe had no fight left in him. 

"Remember, you're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably more than she ever did."
Groucho Marx: Duck Soup (1933)


Beered by Old Buck
ReplyQuote
Advertisements