Notifications
Clear all

My Hikkomori analysis Re-dux

Page 1 / 2
 

The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

My analysis focused upon the false characterization of "Hikkomori" as a clinical illness--in other words men rejecting the paradigm of female supremacy/male submission is somehow a mental illness that needs to be treated.  At the time I argued this was merely another shaming tactic to bring men to heel and get on with the business of working themselves to death for the benefit of women. I knew this would not be the end. IT never is and now we have an example of the gynocracy dialing up the pressure.

Below is an article about the Texas Department of Public Safety (a euphemism for police) producing a document listing INCELs  who in their own words are people who have trouble finding a girlfriend as worthy of being listed on their Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment. Yup Involuntary Celibates (Incels) are:  "an emerging domestic terrorism threat as current adherents demonstrate marked acts or threats of violence in furtherance of their social grievance.”

As a matter of logic the notion that something is "involuntary" but with "adherents" which IS voluntary makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever.  There are of course other illogical issues here: Like what exactly is a "social grievance" and why is rejection by women a social grievance? Women have been rejecting men for thousands of years--its what they do. And what is the difference between "perceived" rejection and I guess real rejection? We are also told the threat of Incel attacks are international, nationwide and in Texas in particular but then goes on to only list three examples in 2014, 2018, 2019 and occurring in three different states: CA TX and FL. That's it? Three?

I also find it interesting that a lack of a girlfriend ends you up on the list---What about women who have no boyfriend? Why are they exempt. So what is the point here: The point is men walking away from their "assigned" role as subservient droogs to women and daring to share their knowledge of the toxic nature of women on line is a direct threat to female supremacy...and therefore cannot be tolerated. Thus we have the gynocracy first characterizing disobedient men as suffering mental illness and now we have the next step---assigning the label of domestic terrorist in an effort to intimidate and coerce men into getting back into their "place". I shudder to imagine what the next step will be. And there will be another and another and another all designed to punish men for daring to reject the paradigm. I suspect that in the future sharing any commentary about women that fails to acknowledge their exalted supremacy will be deemed "hate speech".

These efforts will ultimately all fail--the dynamics which created this situation in the first place not only remain unaddressed but these efforts by women and their servants in government to squelch men represent a doubling down. Always remember the two most most powerful things a man can do is walk away...and don't look back.

Anyway here is the Article: https://www.infowars.com/texas-government-forewarns-incel-rebellion-says-incels-are-emerging-domestic-terrorism-threat/


Beered by WOPR, Uly The Cunning and GregBO
Quote
GregBO
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3814
 
Posted by: @pistolpete

My analysis focused upon the false characterization of "Hikkomori" as a clinical illness--in other words men rejecting the paradigm of female supremacy/male submission is somehow a mental illness that needs to be treated.  At the time I argued this was merely another shaming tactic to bring men to heel and get on with the business of working themselves to death for the benefit of women. I knew this would not be the end. IT never is and now we have an example of the gynocracy dialing up the pressure.

Below is an article about the Texas Department of Public Safety (a euphemism for police) producing a document listing INCELs  who in their own words are people who have trouble finding a girlfriend as worthy of being listed on their Domestic Terrorism Threat Assessment. Yup Involuntary Celibates (Incels) are:  "an emerging domestic terrorism threat as current adherents demonstrate marked acts or threats of violence in furtherance of their social grievance.”

As a matter of logic the notion that something is "involuntary" but with "adherents" which IS voluntary makes absolutely NO sense whatsoever.  There are of course other illogical issues here: Like what exactly is a "social grievance" and why is rejection by women a social grievance? Women have been rejecting men for thousands of years--its what they do. And what is the difference between "perceived" rejection and I guess real rejection? We are also told the threat of Incel attacks are international, nationwide and in Texas in particular but then goes on to only list three examples in 2014, 2018, 2019 and occurring in three different states: CA TX and FL. That's it? Three?

I also find it interesting that a lack of a girlfriend ends you up on the list---What about women who have no boyfriend? Why are they exempt. So what is the point here: The point is men walking away from their "assigned" role as subservient droogs to women and daring to share their knowledge of the toxic nature of women on line is a direct threat to female supremacy...and therefore cannot be tolerated. Thus we have the gynocracy first characterizing disobedient men as suffering mental illness and now we have the next step---assigning the label of domestic terrorist in an effort to intimidate and coerce men into getting back into their "place". I shudder to imagine what the next step will be. And there will be another and another and another all designed to punish men for daring to reject the paradigm. I suspect that in the future sharing any commentary about women that fails to acknowledge their exalted supremacy will be deemed "hate speech".

These efforts will ultimately all fail--the dynamics which created this situation in the first place not only remain unaddressed but these efforts by women and their servants in government to squelch men represent a doubling down. Always remember the two most most powerful things a man can do is walk away...and don't look back.

 

Domestic: relating to the running of a home or to family relations

Terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Can't wait for environmental, health care, religious, racial or ethnic, military issues begin to be addressed under this context.  Anything that sets one apart from the herd will be identified and used to punish you until you rejoin the mass migration towards supporting the hive.

Again, and excellent post regarding the move of social/online issues into mainstream life.  Don't worry about big brother any longer, it's big sister that is of concern.

 

​"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal." -Albert Pike

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland


ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

"Don't worry about big brother any longer, it's big sister that is of concern." Great turn of a phrase MAN! 😉 

 


ReplyQuote
Uly The Cunning
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2863
 

Just another sign that men are no longer playing the game that makes the government and corporations the big bucks. They know that it will continue to get worse for them, unless they can somehow force men to submit themselves to the parasites of society. The real spenders and wasters of resources, that keeps the economy of cheap plastic and imported tomorrow's garbage is females, and they know it.

This will fail, as you stated, Evil Genius, but it will only get worse for the young men of this nation. I believe this will be focused on men in their 30's and younger, to pressure them into taking up the burden of the irresponsible, to continue the cycle of wasteful spending.

This reminds me of an article that I read yesterday, but didn't seem worth its own post. The article was from the NY Times, talking about how we don't have enough young and immigrants in our country to support the growing number of elderly. It goes on to talk about how young men need to settle down and not be picky and how we need to bring in immigrants like many European nations have. All of this sounded like bad advice and only the mentally challenged would even consider such idiocy.

I believe we will be seeing a lot more young men with post-wall females in television and other spotlights, in attempts to normalize this disgusting behavior.

The British filmmaker married "Kick-Ass" star Aaron Johnson, who is 24 years her junior, after directing him in 2009's "Nowhere Boy."

"Remember, you're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably more than she ever did."
Groucho Marx: Duck Soup (1933)


Beered by The Evil Genius
ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

Yup even Keanu Reeves looks like he's dating his mommy. 


Beered by Uly The Cunning
ReplyQuote
GregBO
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3814
 

Just for reference:

https://image.insider.com/5dc19a38d8d84636ad6f8b7a?width=1136&format=jpeg

 

The image is so shocking that wordpress would not let me show it directly!

​"What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal." -Albert Pike

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland


Beered by The Evil Genius
ReplyQuote
Uly The Cunning
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2863
 

This is the plan in reprogramming the youth.

Females become pedophiles and it is okay.
Females date men young enough to be their grandsons and it is okay
Females sleep around and bang a bunch of dudes because she is bored and it is okay....

As I always tell everyone, roll reverse it, and you will see how okay it really is.

Man becomes a pedophile, excommunicated and prison.
Man dates female young enough to be his granddaughter, ridiculed and considered a pervert and sicko.
Man sleeps around and bangs a bunch of dudes, he is gay. (Need a little humor in this dark world.)

The point is, roll reverse it and you will see just how much females are really getting away with, and how privileged they are above men.

"Remember, you're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably more than she ever did."
Groucho Marx: Duck Soup (1933)


Beered by Xanthine, Narrow road, Nerevar and 1 people
ReplyQuote
ID-Less
Man
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 557
 
Posted by: @pistolpete

Always remember the two most most powerful things a man can do is walk away...and don't look back.

Great tip. Must keep walking away/the other way, even if trouble is in front of me. Behind me is easier to walk away from, unless sniper.


Beered by The Evil Genius
ReplyQuote
ID-Less
Man
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 557
 
Posted by: @ulynecro

Just another sign that men are no longer playing the game that makes the government and corporations the big bucks. They know that it will continue to get worse for them, unless they can somehow force men to submit themselves to the parasites of society. The real spenders and wasters of resources, that keeps the economy of cheap plastic and imported tomorrow's garbage is females, and they know it.

This will fail, as you stated, Evil Genius, but it will only get worse for the young men of this nation. I believe this will be focused on men in their 30's and younger, to pressure them into taking up the burden of the irresponsible, to continue the cycle of wasteful spending.

This reminds me of an article that I read yesterday, but didn't seem worth its own post. The article was from the NY Times, talking about how we don't have enough young and immigrants in our country to support the growing number of elderly. It goes on to talk about how young men need to settle down and not be picky and how we need to bring in immigrants like many European nations have. All of this sounded like bad advice and only the mentally challenged would even consider such idiocy.

I believe we will be seeing a lot more young men with post-wall females in television and other spotlights, in attempts to normalize this disgusting behavior.

The British filmmaker married "Kick-Ass" star Aaron Johnson, who is 24 years her junior, after directing him in 2009's "Nowhere Boy."

This is odd. I wrote worse and then deleted it (something about her eyes, nose and mouth that bothers me) but I'm holding my opinion to myself in case I am put on the incel most wanted list. Just imagine me shaking my head from one side to the other. What happened to "trophy wives" has this changed to "trophy aunties? Oh god I wanted to write worse. Ever thought that femiyeasts want to try and be like men sooo much that now they are trying by having someone a lot younger than themselves?

I can't keep my eyes of her she's such a gem. 🤩  Longest arm I've ever seen.


ReplyQuote
Eric Lauder
Founder
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 189
 

The problem with incels is the same problem that had Roosh V during his last times: they're without a direction, attacking everyone, while not having a defense based on a real and COHERENT ideology.

Basically they cannot defend themselves by forwarding a coherent thought: I have read incel wiki, it's a mix of feminism (i.e.: "marriage benefit men more than it benefits women" and "I have the right to attack others but it's UNFAAAIR if they attack me cuz I'm SOOO oppressed!") and MRA/MGTOW, but the mix is made in such way that it left them alone, without sympathizers, and without a logic backing up their argument.

Actually their "logic" seems: throw random attacks at everyone and hope you'll get a woman as a prize.

 

It was the same with Roosh V: he was toasted when he switched from PUA to "weird mix of PUA + tradcon + anti-jew/muslim + conspiracy theories".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2br5gaN0ygA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU
That's, more or less, all about me.
I don't care, I'm ready to fight.
Until the end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AmiFfP9u5c
It's not up to me to say if if I'm Drago or Rocky, but I'm gonna fighting to the end, I'll never give up...


ReplyQuote
Eric Lauder
Founder
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 189
 
Posted by: @pistolpete

Like what exactly is a "social grievance" and why is rejection by women a social grievance?

Incels are little powerless wannabee dictators who dream about stricter laws and rules meant to create a society designed on their needs, where they could marry.  To achieve this, they describe their situation as the world's worst issue. It's basically victimhood and psychological terrorism to ask for stricter laws / fascism: it does NOT work against feminism. The church have lost due confronting feminism with such suicidal tactic, but difference being that the church was powerful and part of the establishment, while the incels are new, without ties and powerless.

Since the power balance is VERY different (incels vs gynocracy compared to church vs feminism) incels are at serious risk in the next future: it's like a mouse frontally attacking a cat. The mouse CANNOT do that and it's at serious risk. While the church vs feminism was like a little dog (Chihuahua) confronting a cat: the Chihuaha is gonna losing but not risking his life. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2br5gaN0ygA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU
That's, more or less, all about me.
I don't care, I'm ready to fight.
Until the end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AmiFfP9u5c
It's not up to me to say if if I'm Drago or Rocky, but I'm gonna fighting to the end, I'll never give up...


ReplyQuote
Uly The Cunning
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2863
 

Maybe it is due to my life being so different, but I find it hard that anyone, aside from those that suffer severe mental disorders, can be involuntary celibate. I have often considered that the incel term was meant to just shame men who were not dating, like calling them a loser for not having a leech in their life. When it comes to labeling men as incels, that is what they will be looking for. You could have been married then divorced, have five kids, and still be an incel when you live alone by choice, because that term is there to assist in the locating of men who do not play the losing game.

On that note, I have even been called an incel by some men and females. My favorite was a female who I turned down a fling with, and called me an incel.

"Remember, you're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably more than she ever did."
Groucho Marx: Duck Soup (1933)


Beered by The Evil Genius and GregBO
ReplyQuote
Xanthine
Founder
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 386
 

I hate to say it, but I understand where these Hikikomori guys are coming from. I don't blame them for what they are doing. When you live in a toxic, fucked up society that hates your entire race and gender, and simply wants to use you as sacrificial tax cattle...it's only natural that you want nothing to do with said society. Why would you want any part of it?

Outside of work, the shooting range, and places I have to go for groceries or crap like that, I completely avoid going out into society. I hate it, I always feel like I have a target on my back.

As far as this "incel rebellion" goes, what a fucking joke. They take a few incidents, and they will now label anything that goes against the feminist, gynocentric narrative as incels and put them on some list. It's the same thing they've done previously, just giving it a new name. Now any man who has grievances about the current state of affairs between the genders will be labeled an "incel" and potential terrorist. They will eventually use this to come after MGTOW as well.

Everything they do is so predictable, and the lies are so obvious, it's almost tiresome. Yet it works on a huge percentage of the population, because people have become such pussy ass, feelings-obsessed morons and have lost any ability for critical thinking they once had.


ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

Well I hate to say it but I think Eric missed the point. The point I was making is that women--through the auspices of government are trying to classify men who have nothing to do with women as either mental cases or terrorists. And MGTOW is on that short list. THAT was the point. 

The only problem I have with INCELs is that they are still worshiping the female golden crotch. That is the object of their desire. (Well that and the fantasy of a loving wife and kids fairy tale). Instead of denigrating them with unnecessary counter-productive pejoratives MGTOW should be an out-reach to them; providing them with information and guidance that will help them eschew their desire to worship and see their fantasy for what it is--a lie. Our job is to aid them in waking up to reality--not criticizing them.  


Beered by Uly The Cunning
ReplyQuote
Eric Lauder
Founder
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 189
 
Posted by: @pistolpete

Well I hate to say it but I think Eric missed the point. The point I was making is that women--through the auspices of government are trying to classify men who have nothing to do with women as either mental cases or terrorists. And MGTOW is on that short list. THAT was the point. 

The only problem I have with INCELs is that they are still worshiping the female golden crotch. That is the object of their desire. (Well that and the fantasy of a loving wife and kids fairy tale). Instead of denigrating them with unnecessary counter-productive pejoratives MGTOW should be an out-reach to them; providing them with information and guidance that will help them eschew their desire to worship and see their fantasy for what it is--a lie. Our job is to aid them in waking up to reality--not criticizing them.  

That's why MGTOW should be neutral and NEVER hostile towards gays and asexuals: as long as gays and asexuals are acceptable there's no way to attack MGTOW on a legal basis. In no way you can attack on a legal basis men who do NOT want to live with and/or have sex with women. Just because even gays and asexuals do the same.

While Incels can be attacked on legal basis just because their tradcon beliefs: incels PRAISE marriage but are suffering for not having to marry - that's actually a form of sufference and therefore an illness, technically.

Shaming is a different thing, but once you know WHY they shame, then shaming become useless, a powerless weapon.

 

Regarding how to act towards incels, my opinion is:

 

Who says "marriage benefits men more than women" (incel theory, from incel wiki) HAVE TO LEARN THE HARD WAY and should never be associated with MGTOW.

 

Most incels blabber about marriage contract being the very best in life, some of them even think that MGTOW is just only a cover for other incels.

They'll learn the difference the hard way, it'll be women and the government to teach them such difference...

 

Sorry, it's realpolitik.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2br5gaN0ygA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU
That's, more or less, all about me.
I don't care, I'm ready to fight.
Until the end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AmiFfP9u5c
It's not up to me to say if if I'm Drago or Rocky, but I'm gonna fighting to the end, I'll never give up...


ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

INCELs cannot be attacked on any legal basis I'm aware of--and reaching out to them in order to educate them about the dangers of marriage I think is a worthy goal. There is no question they are misguided about the value of women  but the answer isn't to attack them. That is counter-productive and purposeless. Given them the evidence that marriage and women are toxic and they will come around. They are men and will respond to logical argument.  Attacking them only aids the divide and conquer strategy of feminists. 

As for gays I wasn't aware that MGTOW is hostile to them, where is the evidence of that proposition? Although it is true that members like myself maintain that homosexuality is an aberrant deviant and perverted activity it is equally true that I do not speak for MGTOW...NO one DOES. That is the whole point to men going there own way--there is no MGTOW orthodoxy test that one must pass.  There is no ideological litmus test and no heirarchy that I'm aware of. Gay straight or otherwise are welcome to embrace the MGTOW lifestyle...even IMCELs


ReplyQuote
The Evil Genius
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2257
Topic starter  

MGTOW is for all men--I say to them join us: The brotherhood is stronger with you than without you.

 


Beered by Uly The Cunning
ReplyQuote
ID-Less
Man
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 557
 
Posted by: @pistolpete

MGTOW is for all men--I say to them join us: The brotherhood is stronger with you than without you.

 

Did you notice that there was a change of coat? How long do you think she could cope without her twitter feed and facebook page?

 


ReplyQuote
Narrow road
Founder
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 331
 

In my estimation, this is another tool. For a woman to be a .gov informant. Allowing a further negation of 4th amendment protection.

Feminism has almost always been. Since it's inception, a tool for a small group of very powerful men. To control the vast majority of women. 

Any who actively resist, the directives of these men.  Women will more often then not. Be the informant to .gov.

In reality, woman as a group. Require men to lead them around. Almost none of them have ever led men. They'll shamelessly nag and fool themselves, into believing that's leadership. 

From my observation. Women have very little intiative. That's why trillions of dollars thrown at them. Results in an almost total loss of the resources. 

Whether woman like the above or not. It's undeniable fact. Women crave mans' attention, ingenuity, initiative, discipline. The list goes on and on. 

They used to get all of that for thousands of years. Then all over civilization. Government officials, stole girls and boys. From their natural environment, mom and dad. Then put nearly all of us in indoctrination camps. 

I personally, accept that .gov indoctrination. Had a negative effect upon my life. Parts of my personality and thinking were labeled unacceptable. By those officials. Years were spent by those officials. Trying to mold me into a good little obedient socialist puppet.

I've never met a woman who agrees with my above statement. That's just the first step for walking away from all this craziness.

Incel is a convenient label to place on a socially ackward, angry man. Irl I've met more than a few of these guys. I can only do so much in face to face interaction time. 

Government lackies, and their psychologist rubber stampers. Will continue to cloud reality. Keeping as many men on the plantation as possible. The sad part of those peoples existence. Is that they only think of the plantation. And their rank within it. They're the real social losers. 

God bless brothers

 


ReplyQuote
ID-Less
Man
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 557
 
Posted by: @narrow-road

In my estimation, this is another tool. For a woman to be a .gov informant. Allowing a further negation of 4th amendment protection.

Feminism has almost always been. Since it's inception, a tool for a small group of very powerful men. To control the vast majority of women. 

Any who actively resist, the directives of these men.  Women will more often then not. Be the informant to .gov.

In reality, woman as a group. Require men to lead them around. Almost none of them have ever led men. They'll shamelessly nag and fool themselves, into believing that's leadership. 

From my observation. Women have very little intiative. That's why trillions of dollars thrown at them. Results in an almost total loss of the resources. 

Whether woman like the above or not. It's undeniable fact. Women crave mans' attention, ingenuity, initiative, discipline. The list goes on and on. 

They used to get all of that for thousands of years. Then all over civilization. Government officials, stole girls and boys. From their natural environment, mom and dad. Then put nearly all of us in indoctrination camps. 

I personally, accept that .gov indoctrination. Had a negative effect upon my life. Parts of my personality and thinking were labeled unacceptable. By those officials. Years were spent by those officials. Trying to mold me into a good little obedient socialist puppet.

I've never met a woman who agrees with my above statement. That's just the first step for walking away from all this craziness.

Incel is a convenient label to place on a socially ackward, angry man. Irl I've met more than a few of these guys. I can only do so much in face to face interaction time. 

Government lackies, and their psychologist rubber stampers. Will continue to cloud reality. Keeping as many men on the plantation as possible. The sad part of those peoples existence. Is that they only think of the plantation. And their rank within it. They're the real social losers. 

God bless brothers

 

You have a very interesting writing style narrow-road. I notice that your use of full stops makes navigation through your writings all the more intriguing because I have to pay attention that much more to the punctuation. I'm not sure whether I am making too much of a personal comment but by no means do I mean any disrespect. On the contrary, it is a unique way.

Now quickly back to the content...

"I personally, accept that .gov indoctrination. Had a negative effect upon my life. Parts of my personality and thinking were labeled unacceptable. By those officials. Years were spent by those officials. Trying to mold me into a good little obedient socialist puppet."

This has been my experience too. I even worked for a .gov organisation that kept on chipping away at me. This indoctrination is real, for those that can see it and for those that can't, a prison as in The Matrix.

Spiraling out of control on from the Matrix...

Matrix -Matriarchy

Wachowskis Brothers - Wachowskis Sisters

Caught in the matrix, free yourself and become a girl. Remember how Agent Smith duplicated himself and this had to be stopped so that the matrix was put back into balance. Hummm. Clear message in that movie.

Who made the matrix? Wachowskis Brothers Sisters. See how this is going? Oh no, it wasn't men that made that cult movie, it was women.

Anyone that is awake will see this as blatant programming and overall crapping on men from a great height.


ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2